- USDT(TRC-20)
- $0.0
The commonly held belief is that thereās a correlation between your happiness at work and your productivity. And while this assertion has been borne out in decades of research studies focusing on how happiness can make you more productive, those studies are lacking important context. It turns out you can be both productive and miserableābut itās not great for you.
Letās look at the science and bust the myth that productivity only occurs when youāre blissed outāand figure out if you might actually need to seek a more fulfillment in spite of your stellar output.
The happy-productive worker thesis is basically a theory that happier workers are better workersāand itās been studied for decades. Like any theory or hypothesis, however, the more itās studied, the more the big brains studying it disagree.
For instance, scholars revisited the theory in 2008, pointing out that even after over 70 years of research, there is still "uncertainty" about whether happier workers even are more productive, since many prior studies relied on participants' descriptions of their job satisfaction, which might not be an effective proxy for happiness, anyway. Check out the abstract here, but the idea is fair enough: You can be satisfied with your income and benefits and pleased enough with your work, but not happy or fulfilled. They embarked on a more longitudinal study and found that among job satisfaction, quality of work life, life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect, positive affect was most strongly, but not exclusively, tied to productivity. In short, there's a lot more to the relationship between happiness and productivity than was originally believed.
So, researchers kept going. In 2019, researchers got more granular with the thesis, suggesting that instead of happy-productive and unhappy-unproductive, there are four patterns a worker could fall into: Happy-productive, unhappy-unproductive, happy-unproductive, and unhappy-productive. Like their predecessors in 2008, these researchers were also annoyed with the past focus on job satisfaction, so they measured happiness in both hedonic and eudaimonic termsāmeaning they measured both pleasure and positivity (hedonic) and workersā growth and sense of meaning (eudaimonic). They found that over half the people they studied were actually unhappy-productive or happy-unproductive, which is bad news for the old belief that happiness and productivity go hand in hand.
Ultimately, they concluded workers are more complex than the original happy-productive worker thesis gives them space to be. In fact, workers can be unhappy in a hedonic way but happy in a eudaimonic way, or vice versa, meaning there can be fun and joy at work but no fulfillment, or the other way around.
For all the energy invested and ink spilled on this kind of research, itās not shocking to everyday people that you can be both unhappy and productive at work, but unhappiness will eventually catch up with you one way or another, so you should strive for happiness. The main insight from the research is that happiness isnāt a one-track thing. You need to be enjoying your environment and fulfilled by what youāre doing. Using the hierarchy of needs to assess your job is a good place to start if you feel like you need to make changes, whether internally at the company or by leaving for another one.
Donāt think that just because youāre meeting benchmarks and doing solid work, everything is fine and dandy. Just because thatās what the old wisdom preaches doesnāt make it correct; you could actually be unhappy-productive and not even clock it until itās too late and youāre headed for a burnout. Spend some time re-evaluating your work-life balance to see where you can make improvements in your hedonic and eudaimonic joys. Maybe youāll be even more productive when youāre even happier.
If you've evaluated your output at work and concluded it's good, but then considered your hierarchy of needs and work-life balance and noticed you're actually not that happy, you have a few options. The good news is that once you've identified the four possibilities for the relationship between your happiness and productivity, you're more informed. The bad news is that with that information, you do need to take some actionāand that's not easy.
Like the scholars mentioned above, who built their work on the backs of other researchers' prior work in the field, start with what's known and see if you can improve on it. Dig into what's making you unhappy and get really weedy with it. Is it something hedonic, like a lack of pay or benefits, or something eudaimonic, like a lack of purpose in the job? Hedonic issues can be addressed with the company, or at least you can try, but fulfillment-related ones are going to call for a little more effort, whether that means investing more in your outside interests or switching careers. Remember that you may be productive while you're unhappy, but that's not sustainable and likely won't last forever, so to achieve true, lasting productivity, the original ideaāthat you need to be happy to be productiveāstill holds some weight.
Full story here:
Letās look at the science and bust the myth that productivity only occurs when youāre blissed outāand figure out if you might actually need to seek a more fulfillment in spite of your stellar output.
What is the happy-productive worker thesis?
The happy-productive worker thesis is basically a theory that happier workers are better workersāand itās been studied for decades. Like any theory or hypothesis, however, the more itās studied, the more the big brains studying it disagree.
For instance, scholars revisited the theory in 2008, pointing out that even after over 70 years of research, there is still "uncertainty" about whether happier workers even are more productive, since many prior studies relied on participants' descriptions of their job satisfaction, which might not be an effective proxy for happiness, anyway. Check out the abstract here, but the idea is fair enough: You can be satisfied with your income and benefits and pleased enough with your work, but not happy or fulfilled. They embarked on a more longitudinal study and found that among job satisfaction, quality of work life, life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect, positive affect was most strongly, but not exclusively, tied to productivity. In short, there's a lot more to the relationship between happiness and productivity than was originally believed.
So, researchers kept going. In 2019, researchers got more granular with the thesis, suggesting that instead of happy-productive and unhappy-unproductive, there are four patterns a worker could fall into: Happy-productive, unhappy-unproductive, happy-unproductive, and unhappy-productive. Like their predecessors in 2008, these researchers were also annoyed with the past focus on job satisfaction, so they measured happiness in both hedonic and eudaimonic termsāmeaning they measured both pleasure and positivity (hedonic) and workersā growth and sense of meaning (eudaimonic). They found that over half the people they studied were actually unhappy-productive or happy-unproductive, which is bad news for the old belief that happiness and productivity go hand in hand.
Ultimately, they concluded workers are more complex than the original happy-productive worker thesis gives them space to be. In fact, workers can be unhappy in a hedonic way but happy in a eudaimonic way, or vice versa, meaning there can be fun and joy at work but no fulfillment, or the other way around.
What does this relationship between happiness and productivity mean for you?
For all the energy invested and ink spilled on this kind of research, itās not shocking to everyday people that you can be both unhappy and productive at work, but unhappiness will eventually catch up with you one way or another, so you should strive for happiness. The main insight from the research is that happiness isnāt a one-track thing. You need to be enjoying your environment and fulfilled by what youāre doing. Using the hierarchy of needs to assess your job is a good place to start if you feel like you need to make changes, whether internally at the company or by leaving for another one.
Donāt think that just because youāre meeting benchmarks and doing solid work, everything is fine and dandy. Just because thatās what the old wisdom preaches doesnāt make it correct; you could actually be unhappy-productive and not even clock it until itās too late and youāre headed for a burnout. Spend some time re-evaluating your work-life balance to see where you can make improvements in your hedonic and eudaimonic joys. Maybe youāll be even more productive when youāre even happier.
What to do if you're unhappy-productive
If you've evaluated your output at work and concluded it's good, but then considered your hierarchy of needs and work-life balance and noticed you're actually not that happy, you have a few options. The good news is that once you've identified the four possibilities for the relationship between your happiness and productivity, you're more informed. The bad news is that with that information, you do need to take some actionāand that's not easy.
Like the scholars mentioned above, who built their work on the backs of other researchers' prior work in the field, start with what's known and see if you can improve on it. Dig into what's making you unhappy and get really weedy with it. Is it something hedonic, like a lack of pay or benefits, or something eudaimonic, like a lack of purpose in the job? Hedonic issues can be addressed with the company, or at least you can try, but fulfillment-related ones are going to call for a little more effort, whether that means investing more in your outside interests or switching careers. Remember that you may be productive while you're unhappy, but that's not sustainable and likely won't last forever, so to achieve true, lasting productivity, the original ideaāthat you need to be happy to be productiveāstill holds some weight.
Full story here:
![[DK]](/data/avatars/s/57/57999.jpg?1720990206){kind=avatar}
