- USDT(TRC-20)
- $0.0
If youâll permit me a rantâI promise to make it fact-filled and interestingâI am sick of the articles that seem to pop up every few months claiming that we are all eating âtoo muchâ protein. They convey an inaccurate picture of how the body uses protein, and they demonize perfectly healthy meals that happen to be high in protein. Itâs time to set the record straight.
How can these articles be so wrong? I think the authors are usually well-meaning, but their facts donât support the conclusion. They tend to bolster their argument with statements that are true, like the fact that the RDA of protein is set at 0.36 grams per pound of body weight, that protein-boosted foods are trendy, and that it is possible to get plenty of protein while eating a vegan diet. But the framing and the conclusions donât follow, because eating more than the minimum doesnât mean that youâre getting âtoo muchâ protein.
As a refresher, protein is one of the three calorie-containing macronutrients (fats, carbs, protein) that make up our diets. Proteins are made of amino acids, and they are required for the growth, repair, and functioning of our body.
We can get protein from a variety of sources. Meats are particularly protein-dense; a chicken breast contains about 35 grams of protein. Other animal products, like milk and eggs, are also rich in protein. Plant-based foods tend to have less protein, but itâs not hard to meet or exceed protein requirements even on a vegan diet. Beans, grains, and soy products like tofu contain significant amounts of protein, for example.
If youâd like a cheat sheet on how much protein youâre supposed to eat based on your activity level, you can find one here. And thatâs a good place to start dissecting this âtoo much proteinâ myth, because before we can declare an amount of protein to be âtoo much,â we need to understand how much is âenough.â
The government communicates targets for different nutrients to encourage us all to eat a healthy, balanced diet. These targets are the basis for the â% daily valueâ labels on the back of packaged foods, and for the nutrient makeup of school lunches. The RDA, or recommended daily allowance, is defined as âthe average daily dietary intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all (97 to 98 percent) healthy individuals in a group.â
So how is that ânutrient requirementâ determined? For protein, it is based on nitrogen balance. Humans break down proteins, excreting nitrogen, as part of the bodyâs daily function. If you eat enough protein (which contains nitrogen), the amount of nitrogen you excrete will be the same as, or more than, the amount you eat. In other words, if you arenât breaking your own body proteins down (in excess of what you eat), then whatever youâre eating must be, in some sense, enough.
In this way of thinking, the RDA is the minimum to stay healthy. More is fine; less would mean that you may not be getting enough. For some nutrients, there is also an UL, or upper limit, telling you that more than a certain amount is too much. Upper limits are calculated for vitamins and minerals; there is no upper limit defined for protein.
Therefore, there is no official definition for âtoo muchâ protein. If somebody eats more than the RDA, theyâre not eating too much; theyâre just eating more than the minimum. Youâre supposed to eat more than the minimum.
The RDA for protein is set at 46 grams per day for a 125-pound woman, and at 56 grams per day for a 154-pound man. Thatâs based on an RDA of 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram bodyweight, which works out to 0.36 grams per pound. So a 200-pound person would need 72 grams of protein per day.
This USDA report found that most adult men average between roughly 90 to 100 grams of protein per day, although men aged 70 and up only get about 80 grams of protein per day. Women tend to average around 70 grams per day, with those aged 70 and up averaging 62 grams.
Above the RDA? Yes. Too much? I donât see any way of arguing that. And before you say that weâre getting almost double the recommendation, let's check the math. Those RDA numbers are for 125- and 154-pound people. On the other hand, the averages for what we eat are based on actual people, not ideals. The average American man is 200 pounds, and the average American woman is 171 pounds. That puts their RDAs at 72 and 62 grams per day, respectively. Relative to those numbers, the average woman is just barely beating the minimum; the average man is 20-25 grams over.
Again, thereâs no need to stick to the minimum; going 25 grams over is fine. Itâs probably better to go over than to just scrape by, and many of us arguably donât get enough. Let me explain.
Letâs start with older adults. Not only does protein intake tend to decrease with age, older adults are vulnerable to issues that stem from a loss of muscle mass. People tend to lose 3-5% of their muscle mass per year starting at age 30, but strength training and protein intake can support maintaining our muscle, and thus likely prevent or reduce that decline.
The Dietary Guidelines include a note that âAbout 50 percent of women and 30 percent of men 71 and older fall short of protein foods recommendations.â Meanwhile, a study found that older adults who donât meet the recommendations are âmore likely to be limited when stooping, crouching, or kneeling, standing or sitting for long periods, walking up 10 steps, preparing meals, and walking for a quarter mile.â
So even if itâs true that the average adult gets more protein than recommended, there are clearly a lot of elderly folks who donât. These are the same people who have more issues functioning in everyday life. This may be a chicken-and-egg situationâwas the functional decline a cause or an effect of the change in their diet?âbut this sure does not seem to be a group of people who should be eating less protein.
Thereâs another large group of people who benefit from more, not less, protein: people who are pregnant or lactating. Instead of 0.36 grams of protein per pound of bodyweight (62 grams for a 171-pound person), the RDA for people who are pregnant or lactating is 0.5 grams/pound (so, 86 grams of protein per day).
When youâre pregnant, you also have higher caloric needs, so the increased total amount of food makes it easier to get the higher protein amount. Still, it makes more sense to spend your energy on making sure youâre getting enough protein, rather than worrying about getting too much.
You knew we heading in this direction (I say between reps of barbell squats, wiping protein shake off my lips): People who exercise should get more protein than just the RDA.
While the fear-mongering âtoo much proteinâ articles sometimes mention that bodybuilders or elite athletes need their protein, they tend to hand-wave this away as a special concern that doesnât apply to normal people. But I think itâs worth a closer lookâand honestly, this situation applies to a lot more people than just a few athletes.
Officially, there isnât an RDA for athletes; people who exercise can stave off malnutrition with the same 0.36 grams per pound as everyone else. But that doesnât mean that the RDA is the best target to aim for.
The International Association of Athletics Federations, which governs track and field competitions, recommends that most athletes who are maintaining or gaining weight eat 0.59 to 0.77 grams of protein per pound of bodyweight per day. Thatâs 101 to 131 grams for the average 171-pound woman, and 118 to 154 grams for a 200-pound man.
A group of organizations including the American College of Sports Medicine largely agrees, recommending a range from 0.54 to 0.9 grams per pound for all athletes whose weight is stable or gaining. That includes people who do endurance training like distance running, as well as strength athletes whose exercise involves mainly lifting weights. Those ranges would go as high as 153 grams for our 171-pound woman, and 180 grams for our 200-pound man.
You donât need to be an Olympian to consider yourself an âathleteâ in this sense. If youâre training for a half marathon, youâre doing plenty of distance running, and should fuel accordingly. And if youâre âjustâ lifting weights in the gym, but taking it seriously enough that youâre training regularly and working hard, you should consider eating in these ranges as well.
Dieting to lose weight is not only a popular American pastime, itâs also arguably good for at least some of your health. If youâve been on a diet recently, or if youâre planning to go on one, you arenât a person who should settle for the RDA either.
Research shows that protein intake (and strength trainingâthey go together!) is important to maintain muscle mass when weâre losing weight. After all, youâre aiming for fat loss, not trying to get your muscles to waste away.
For example, this study found that diets ranging from 0.48 to 0.72 grams of protein per kg of body weight (thatâs 82 to 123 grams for our 171-pound woman, 96 to 144 for our 200-pound man) resulted in less weight regain after the diet, and helped people to maintain muscle mass and feel more full while they were dieting.
And if youâre losing weight and exercising? The IAAF recommends that athletes who are âundertaking high-quality weight lossâ need at least 0.72 grams per pound of bodyweight, and possibly as much as 1.09 grams per pound. That would be 186 grams for a 171-pound athlete, or 218 grams for a 200-pound athlete. Most people wonât need to go that high, and itâs unclear whether athletes need to go that high. But Iâm including these numbers so you see how high the ranges actually go.
Ultimately, weight loss is widely understood to be more effective and have healthier results with higher protein intakes rather than lower ones. When people focus on just eating less, without thinking about what their diet actually consists of, itâs easy to forget about protein. But the evidence suggests that you should increase protein when youâre decreasing overall calories.
This is a common talking point in those articles about âtoo muchâ protein, and itâs sort of trueâbut it also doesnât mean what you think it means.
When you eat more food than your body needs, your body can store it as fat. Thatâs true no matter what the excess is made ofâprotein, carbs, fat, or even alcohol. The protein you eat gets used for many different things in your body. You can build it into muscle tissue, use it for growth and repair of different kinds of cells, and so on. You can also use it for energyâbasically, burning it for the calories.
So if you were eating a perfectly balanced diet, and then decided to add an extra 100 grams of protein per day, then sure, a lot of that protein would be used for energy, and since weâd have excess energy, it would get stored as fat.
But if you ate more protein, and that protein replaced other foods in your diet, then there would be no excess calories to store. Nobody is saying you should chug a couple of protein shakes on top of your regular diet. Theyâre saying (Iâm saying) that you should plan your meals and snacks to include more protein.
For example, if your regular lunch is a turkey-and-cheese sandwich with a side of chips, you could improve the protein content of your diet by adding more turkey to the sandwich and replacing the chips with an apple. Same total calories, but more protein. As long as your total calories for the day arenât in excess of your needs, the âextraâ protein wonât get stored as fat.
In general, high protein diets donât have any serious health consequences. Thereâs a major exception, though: in some medical conditions, you may be told to limit your protein intake to protect your health.
For example, people with chronic kidney disease are often advised to use the RDA (0.36 grams per pound of body weight) as a maximum rather than a minimum. Your kidneys play a role in processing protein for excretion, so a lowered protein intake reduces the amount of work that a damaged kidney has to do. That said, once a person with chronic kidney disease begins dialysis, they may be advised to increase their protein intake for better health now that their body has help to handle the higher levels.
People with certain other disorders, like phenylketonuria and homocystinuria, may also be advised to eat a low protein diet. Obviously, if you have one of these conditions, you should be getting your dietary advice from your medical team (ask for a referral to a dietitian!) rather than from general articles on the internet.
Besides those known medical issues, the occasional findings about eating âtoo muchâ protein tend to fit into the âX is good for you/X is bad for youâ ricochet news cycle. Theyâre not holistic assessments of protein in general on health in general, but rather specific research questions that are still being figured out.
For example, this study found that a high protein (and high fiber) diet seemed to slightly worsen one measure of insulin resistance; but it also improved metabolic health and body composition. The researchers concluded that the subjectsâ body chemistry was probably just responding appropriately to the changed nutrient content of their diet. A few years later, a study of high-BMI women with insulin resistance saw improvements to their insulin resistance on a high protein diet.
Or to take another example, a study earlier this year found a link between high protein diets and atherosclerosis. But if you look at what the researchers were actually studying, they were looking at how leucine (one amino acid found in protein) affects the mTOR biochemical pathway in certain types of white blood cells. By the way, that mTOR pathway is involved in a lot more body processes than atherosclerosis, and does a lot of good things too.
So are these results interesting, and worth further study? Definitely. Worth changing protein recommendations? Only if this effect turns out (1) to actually lead to worse health outcomes, and (2) to outweigh the known benefits of higher protein. The body of evidence doesnât support lowering protein recommendations, nor adding an upper limit.
So if protein is good for us, and most of us canât really get âtoo much,â why are so many people arguing that weâre overdoing it?
I think part of the reason is just misunderstanding (the writers donât tend to have a background in nutrition and especially not in sports nutrition), but more often, I think theyâre talking about a different issue entirely.
Often the âtoo much proteinâ stuff is just a way of talking about the environmental effects of meat consumption or dairy farming. People making this argument are trying to pry the double cheeseburgers out of our hands and reassuring us that weâll be okay. I donât think an attack on protein is an appropriate way to make that point, since plant-based proteins exist and are a fine alternative. But I understand where theyâre coming from.
Ultimately, if youâre trying to make the argument that weâre eating âtoo muchâ protein for our health, you really canât do that without some evidence that weâre eating so much protein that itâs harming our health on a widespread level. And that evidence just doesnât exist.
To understand that point, just look at the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This is the master document that tells us what we should be eating and what government programs should be funding. The goals include reducing rates of heart disease and diabetes, and making sure people get enough vitamins. There are Key Recommendations to limit certain nutrientsâspecifically sugars, saturated fats, sodium, and alcohol. There is no recommendation to reduce your intake of protein.
Full story here:
How can these articles be so wrong? I think the authors are usually well-meaning, but their facts donât support the conclusion. They tend to bolster their argument with statements that are true, like the fact that the RDA of protein is set at 0.36 grams per pound of body weight, that protein-boosted foods are trendy, and that it is possible to get plenty of protein while eating a vegan diet. But the framing and the conclusions donât follow, because eating more than the minimum doesnât mean that youâre getting âtoo muchâ protein.
What foods contain protein?
As a refresher, protein is one of the three calorie-containing macronutrients (fats, carbs, protein) that make up our diets. Proteins are made of amino acids, and they are required for the growth, repair, and functioning of our body.
We can get protein from a variety of sources. Meats are particularly protein-dense; a chicken breast contains about 35 grams of protein. Other animal products, like milk and eggs, are also rich in protein. Plant-based foods tend to have less protein, but itâs not hard to meet or exceed protein requirements even on a vegan diet. Beans, grains, and soy products like tofu contain significant amounts of protein, for example.
If youâd like a cheat sheet on how much protein youâre supposed to eat based on your activity level, you can find one here. And thatâs a good place to start dissecting this âtoo much proteinâ myth, because before we can declare an amount of protein to be âtoo much,â we need to understand how much is âenough.â
The RDA is meant to be considered a minimum
The government communicates targets for different nutrients to encourage us all to eat a healthy, balanced diet. These targets are the basis for the â% daily valueâ labels on the back of packaged foods, and for the nutrient makeup of school lunches. The RDA, or recommended daily allowance, is defined as âthe average daily dietary intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all (97 to 98 percent) healthy individuals in a group.â
So how is that ânutrient requirementâ determined? For protein, it is based on nitrogen balance. Humans break down proteins, excreting nitrogen, as part of the bodyâs daily function. If you eat enough protein (which contains nitrogen), the amount of nitrogen you excrete will be the same as, or more than, the amount you eat. In other words, if you arenât breaking your own body proteins down (in excess of what you eat), then whatever youâre eating must be, in some sense, enough.
In this way of thinking, the RDA is the minimum to stay healthy. More is fine; less would mean that you may not be getting enough. For some nutrients, there is also an UL, or upper limit, telling you that more than a certain amount is too much. Upper limits are calculated for vitamins and minerals; there is no upper limit defined for protein.
Therefore, there is no official definition for âtoo muchâ protein. If somebody eats more than the RDA, theyâre not eating too much; theyâre just eating more than the minimum. Youâre supposed to eat more than the minimum.
How much is the RDA for protein, and how much is the average American actually eating?
The RDA for protein is set at 46 grams per day for a 125-pound woman, and at 56 grams per day for a 154-pound man. Thatâs based on an RDA of 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram bodyweight, which works out to 0.36 grams per pound. So a 200-pound person would need 72 grams of protein per day.
This USDA report found that most adult men average between roughly 90 to 100 grams of protein per day, although men aged 70 and up only get about 80 grams of protein per day. Women tend to average around 70 grams per day, with those aged 70 and up averaging 62 grams.
Above the RDA? Yes. Too much? I donât see any way of arguing that. And before you say that weâre getting almost double the recommendation, let's check the math. Those RDA numbers are for 125- and 154-pound people. On the other hand, the averages for what we eat are based on actual people, not ideals. The average American man is 200 pounds, and the average American woman is 171 pounds. That puts their RDAs at 72 and 62 grams per day, respectively. Relative to those numbers, the average woman is just barely beating the minimum; the average man is 20-25 grams over.
Again, thereâs no need to stick to the minimum; going 25 grams over is fine. Itâs probably better to go over than to just scrape by, and many of us arguably donât get enough. Let me explain.
Many older adults donât get enough protein
Letâs start with older adults. Not only does protein intake tend to decrease with age, older adults are vulnerable to issues that stem from a loss of muscle mass. People tend to lose 3-5% of their muscle mass per year starting at age 30, but strength training and protein intake can support maintaining our muscle, and thus likely prevent or reduce that decline.
The Dietary Guidelines include a note that âAbout 50 percent of women and 30 percent of men 71 and older fall short of protein foods recommendations.â Meanwhile, a study found that older adults who donât meet the recommendations are âmore likely to be limited when stooping, crouching, or kneeling, standing or sitting for long periods, walking up 10 steps, preparing meals, and walking for a quarter mile.â
So even if itâs true that the average adult gets more protein than recommended, there are clearly a lot of elderly folks who donât. These are the same people who have more issues functioning in everyday life. This may be a chicken-and-egg situationâwas the functional decline a cause or an effect of the change in their diet?âbut this sure does not seem to be a group of people who should be eating less protein.
You need more than the default RDA if youâre pregnant or lactating
Thereâs another large group of people who benefit from more, not less, protein: people who are pregnant or lactating. Instead of 0.36 grams of protein per pound of bodyweight (62 grams for a 171-pound person), the RDA for people who are pregnant or lactating is 0.5 grams/pound (so, 86 grams of protein per day).
When youâre pregnant, you also have higher caloric needs, so the increased total amount of food makes it easier to get the higher protein amount. Still, it makes more sense to spend your energy on making sure youâre getting enough protein, rather than worrying about getting too much.
Higher-protein diets support healthy exercise and muscle mass
You knew we heading in this direction (I say between reps of barbell squats, wiping protein shake off my lips): People who exercise should get more protein than just the RDA.
While the fear-mongering âtoo much proteinâ articles sometimes mention that bodybuilders or elite athletes need their protein, they tend to hand-wave this away as a special concern that doesnât apply to normal people. But I think itâs worth a closer lookâand honestly, this situation applies to a lot more people than just a few athletes.
Officially, there isnât an RDA for athletes; people who exercise can stave off malnutrition with the same 0.36 grams per pound as everyone else. But that doesnât mean that the RDA is the best target to aim for.
The International Association of Athletics Federations, which governs track and field competitions, recommends that most athletes who are maintaining or gaining weight eat 0.59 to 0.77 grams of protein per pound of bodyweight per day. Thatâs 101 to 131 grams for the average 171-pound woman, and 118 to 154 grams for a 200-pound man.
A group of organizations including the American College of Sports Medicine largely agrees, recommending a range from 0.54 to 0.9 grams per pound for all athletes whose weight is stable or gaining. That includes people who do endurance training like distance running, as well as strength athletes whose exercise involves mainly lifting weights. Those ranges would go as high as 153 grams for our 171-pound woman, and 180 grams for our 200-pound man.
You donât need to be an Olympian to consider yourself an âathleteâ in this sense. If youâre training for a half marathon, youâre doing plenty of distance running, and should fuel accordingly. And if youâre âjustâ lifting weights in the gym, but taking it seriously enough that youâre training regularly and working hard, you should consider eating in these ranges as well.
Higher-protein diets support healthy weight loss
Dieting to lose weight is not only a popular American pastime, itâs also arguably good for at least some of your health. If youâve been on a diet recently, or if youâre planning to go on one, you arenât a person who should settle for the RDA either.
Research shows that protein intake (and strength trainingâthey go together!) is important to maintain muscle mass when weâre losing weight. After all, youâre aiming for fat loss, not trying to get your muscles to waste away.
For example, this study found that diets ranging from 0.48 to 0.72 grams of protein per kg of body weight (thatâs 82 to 123 grams for our 171-pound woman, 96 to 144 for our 200-pound man) resulted in less weight regain after the diet, and helped people to maintain muscle mass and feel more full while they were dieting.
And if youâre losing weight and exercising? The IAAF recommends that athletes who are âundertaking high-quality weight lossâ need at least 0.72 grams per pound of bodyweight, and possibly as much as 1.09 grams per pound. That would be 186 grams for a 171-pound athlete, or 218 grams for a 200-pound athlete. Most people wonât need to go that high, and itâs unclear whether athletes need to go that high. But Iâm including these numbers so you see how high the ranges actually go.
Ultimately, weight loss is widely understood to be more effective and have healthier results with higher protein intakes rather than lower ones. When people focus on just eating less, without thinking about what their diet actually consists of, itâs easy to forget about protein. But the evidence suggests that you should increase protein when youâre decreasing overall calories.
Does âtoo muchâ protein turn into fat?
This is a common talking point in those articles about âtoo muchâ protein, and itâs sort of trueâbut it also doesnât mean what you think it means.
When you eat more food than your body needs, your body can store it as fat. Thatâs true no matter what the excess is made ofâprotein, carbs, fat, or even alcohol. The protein you eat gets used for many different things in your body. You can build it into muscle tissue, use it for growth and repair of different kinds of cells, and so on. You can also use it for energyâbasically, burning it for the calories.
So if you were eating a perfectly balanced diet, and then decided to add an extra 100 grams of protein per day, then sure, a lot of that protein would be used for energy, and since weâd have excess energy, it would get stored as fat.
But if you ate more protein, and that protein replaced other foods in your diet, then there would be no excess calories to store. Nobody is saying you should chug a couple of protein shakes on top of your regular diet. Theyâre saying (Iâm saying) that you should plan your meals and snacks to include more protein.
For example, if your regular lunch is a turkey-and-cheese sandwich with a side of chips, you could improve the protein content of your diet by adding more turkey to the sandwich and replacing the chips with an apple. Same total calories, but more protein. As long as your total calories for the day arenât in excess of your needs, the âextraâ protein wonât get stored as fat.
Is it bad to get too much protein?
In general, high protein diets donât have any serious health consequences. Thereâs a major exception, though: in some medical conditions, you may be told to limit your protein intake to protect your health.
For example, people with chronic kidney disease are often advised to use the RDA (0.36 grams per pound of body weight) as a maximum rather than a minimum. Your kidneys play a role in processing protein for excretion, so a lowered protein intake reduces the amount of work that a damaged kidney has to do. That said, once a person with chronic kidney disease begins dialysis, they may be advised to increase their protein intake for better health now that their body has help to handle the higher levels.
People with certain other disorders, like phenylketonuria and homocystinuria, may also be advised to eat a low protein diet. Obviously, if you have one of these conditions, you should be getting your dietary advice from your medical team (ask for a referral to a dietitian!) rather than from general articles on the internet.
Wasnât there a study that said too much protein is bad?
Besides those known medical issues, the occasional findings about eating âtoo muchâ protein tend to fit into the âX is good for you/X is bad for youâ ricochet news cycle. Theyâre not holistic assessments of protein in general on health in general, but rather specific research questions that are still being figured out.
For example, this study found that a high protein (and high fiber) diet seemed to slightly worsen one measure of insulin resistance; but it also improved metabolic health and body composition. The researchers concluded that the subjectsâ body chemistry was probably just responding appropriately to the changed nutrient content of their diet. A few years later, a study of high-BMI women with insulin resistance saw improvements to their insulin resistance on a high protein diet.
Or to take another example, a study earlier this year found a link between high protein diets and atherosclerosis. But if you look at what the researchers were actually studying, they were looking at how leucine (one amino acid found in protein) affects the mTOR biochemical pathway in certain types of white blood cells. By the way, that mTOR pathway is involved in a lot more body processes than atherosclerosis, and does a lot of good things too.
So are these results interesting, and worth further study? Definitely. Worth changing protein recommendations? Only if this effect turns out (1) to actually lead to worse health outcomes, and (2) to outweigh the known benefits of higher protein. The body of evidence doesnât support lowering protein recommendations, nor adding an upper limit.
Thereâs no urgent health problem that lowering our protein intake will solve
So if protein is good for us, and most of us canât really get âtoo much,â why are so many people arguing that weâre overdoing it?
I think part of the reason is just misunderstanding (the writers donât tend to have a background in nutrition and especially not in sports nutrition), but more often, I think theyâre talking about a different issue entirely.
Often the âtoo much proteinâ stuff is just a way of talking about the environmental effects of meat consumption or dairy farming. People making this argument are trying to pry the double cheeseburgers out of our hands and reassuring us that weâll be okay. I donât think an attack on protein is an appropriate way to make that point, since plant-based proteins exist and are a fine alternative. But I understand where theyâre coming from.
Ultimately, if youâre trying to make the argument that weâre eating âtoo muchâ protein for our health, you really canât do that without some evidence that weâre eating so much protein that itâs harming our health on a widespread level. And that evidence just doesnât exist.
To understand that point, just look at the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This is the master document that tells us what we should be eating and what government programs should be funding. The goals include reducing rates of heart disease and diabetes, and making sure people get enough vitamins. There are Key Recommendations to limit certain nutrientsâspecifically sugars, saturated fats, sodium, and alcohol. There is no recommendation to reduce your intake of protein.
Full story here: